Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Cocoa Parlor Into Dark 80%

 
























About:  Made in Laguna Niguel in Southern California by Karen. No last name, but she's also a surfer, and the whole website is beach themed. Worked for me, to be honest. This is the darkest of their handful of different bars.

Flavor: Not as good as I'd hoped but okay. They make their own bars, but at least this bar didn't have that fresh, fruity flavor I'd have expected. It's dark and earthy, but also tastes a bit over roasted to me.

Texture: Honestly, and somewhat disappointingly, not super smooth. If I compare (unfair! unfair!) to the similarly dark 78% Lindt bar (unfair! unfair!). the latter is super smooth; unbelievably smooth. This bar is chalky.

My rating:  Kind of a 5, le sigh.



Rating Value Meaning
1 Really bad chocolate. There's something just really really wrong here in almost every imaginable respect.
2 A bar with this rating has at least two drawbacks.
3 A bar where something is starting to get seriously wrong.... for example, really weak flavor with an otherwise acceptable texture.
4 This bar is below average, but just slightly. Mostly it's not worth eating again. Something isn't quite up to par, for example a poor texture but fine flavor.
5 This is an average good bar that's worth eating. There's nothing really wrong with it, but also nothing particularly spectacular. Or, perhaps it has a good characteristic that's evenly counter-weighted by something weak.
6 A solidly good bar with one characteristic that's above par, for example a great texture.
7 An solidly good chocolate that has two above par characteristics, but nothing mind-blowing. Good, above average flavor, but nothing to die for.
8 An excellent bar with no weaknesses and at least one characteristic that's super.
9 An awesome bar to die for with amazing texture and flavor.
10 You have been touched by God.


Back to the list of bars

Tuesday, June 12, 2018

Figaro Sladka Vesen 70% cacao (Kakaa)


 
























About: Figaro is a Czech made chocolate, owned by Mondelez International (who makes Milka (shudder) and Cote d'Or (okay, whew)). This is a slovenian brand with heritage going back to the 1890.

Flavor: This chocolate has an interesting round flavor that I can't quite describe. It's smokey. It's not very fruity, and it's not very long lasting. But the smokey flavor is different and interesting.

Texture: Completely reasonable.

My rating: 7 for being interesting. not sure how much I actually LIKE it. But interesting.



Rating Value Meaning
1 Really bad chocolate. There's something just really really wrong here in almost every imaginable respect.
2 A bar with this rating has at least two drawbacks.
3 A bar where something is starting to get seriously wrong.... for example, really weak flavor with an otherwise acceptable texture.
4 This bar is below average, but just slightly. Mostly it's not worth eating again. Something isn't quite up to par, for example a poor texture but fine flavor.
5 This is an average good bar that's worth eating. There's nothing really wrong with it, but also nothing particularly spectacular. Or, perhaps it has a good characteristic that's evenly counter-weighted by something weak.
6 A solidly good bar with one characteristic that's above par, for example a great texture.
7 An solidly good chocolate that has two above par characteristics, but nothing mind-blowing. Good, above average flavor, but nothing to die for.
8 An excellent bar with no weaknesses and at least one characteristic that's super.
9 An awesome bar to die for with amazing texture and flavor.
10 You have been touched by God.


Back to the list of bars

El Buen cacao 80% bean to bar

 






















About: El Buen is a bean-to-bar manufacturer based in Idyllwild, CA. Idyllwild! how can you go wrong. They eat tree bark there and live on sunshine. Their bars have beans and sugar. They make a handful of bars and some truffles. 

Flavor: I had this bar around a while, and so perhaps that's why I found it lacking in flavor. I really think that must be it, because there's nothing good I can say about the chocolate I ate. But I do think it's probably the age.

Texture: Same as for the flavor.

My rating:  Kind-of 4, but a 5 because maybe it's my fault. I'll have to revisit.



Rating Value Meaning
1 Really bad chocolate. There's something just really really wrong here in almost every imaginable respect.
2 A bar with this rating has at least two drawbacks.
3 A bar where something is starting to get seriously wrong.... for example, really weak flavor with an otherwise acceptable texture.
4 This bar is below average, but just slightly. Mostly it's not worth eating again. Something isn't quite up to par, for example a poor texture but fine flavor.
5 This is an average good bar that's worth eating. There's nothing really wrong with it, but also nothing particularly spectacular. Or, perhaps it has a good characteristic that's evenly counter-weighted by something weak.
6 A solidly good bar with one characteristic that's above par, for example a great texture.
7 An solidly good chocolate that has two above par characteristics, but nothing mind-blowing. Good, above average flavor, but nothing to die for.
8 An excellent bar with no weaknesses and at least one characteristic that's super.
9 An awesome bar to die for with amazing texture and flavor.
10 You have been touched by God.


Back to the list of bars

Monday, June 11, 2018

French Broad Chocolates Nicaragua 68% dark chocolate


 























About: French Broad chocolates proclaims first and foremost on their website: We make awesome chocolate.  I agree. They make it in North Carolina, with attention to detail from the box to the chocolate. I found their marketing to be unpretentious ("awesome" not withstanding) and passionate. Their founding story is inside the box (buy one and read it), and they even include a short description of how to enjoy the chocolate.

Flavor:Early and full flavored, with hints of raisin, and current. Tangy, with a long follow-through. At 68%, it's sweet. Perhaps a tad sweet for me, seeing as I am already so sweet.

Texture:Good, but just a bit chalky. If the bar has a weakness, it's this.

My rating:  Solid 8. Would be a 9, but for the chalkiness.



Rating Value Meaning
1 Really bad chocolate. There's something just really really wrong here in almost every imaginable respect.
2 A bar with this rating has at least two drawbacks.
3 A bar where something is starting to get seriously wrong.... for example, really weak flavor with an otherwise acceptable texture.
4 This bar is below average, but just slightly. Mostly it's not worth eating again. Something isn't quite up to par, for example a poor texture but fine flavor.
5 This is an average good bar that's worth eating. There's nothing really wrong with it, but also nothing particularly spectacular. Or, perhaps it has a good characteristic that's evenly counter-weighted by something weak.
6 A solidly good bar with one characteristic that's above par, for example a great texture.
7 An solidly good chocolate that has two above par characteristics, but nothing mind-blowing. Good, above average flavor, but nothing to die for.
8 An excellent bar with no weaknesses and at least one characteristic that's super.
9 An awesome bar to die for with amazing texture and flavor.
10 You have been touched by God.


Back to the list of bars

Friday, June 8, 2018

Vivani 85% cacao

 























About:Vivani is a German brand. They make a wide variety of chocolates, flavored and pure, as well as other chocolate confections and even chocolate cream (which is, I think, a sort of spread). They claim to have a heritage of over 100 years of chocolate making, but it's all a bit hazy. 

Flavor: The dark chocolate is slightly bitter. If you're thinking, "yes, dumdum, it's dark chocolate," I'll respond that it's bitter for a dark chocolate. Moreover, the flavor, when it does come out, is not pronounced or strong. It's like basic, earthy chocolate, but without much in the way of fruitiness.

Texture:Smooth for such a high-content chocolate bar, but not so smooth that you'll write your mother about it. It's basically fine.


My rating:  A 6 for nice texture but rather average, at best, flavor.



Rating Value Meaning
1 Really bad chocolate. There's something just really really wrong here in almost every imaginable respect.
2 A bar with this rating has at least two drawbacks.
3 A bar where something is starting to get seriously wrong.... for example, really weak flavor with an otherwise acceptable texture.
4 This bar is below average, but just slightly. Mostly it's not worth eating again. Something isn't quite up to par, for example a poor texture but fine flavor.
5 This is an average good bar that's worth eating. There's nothing really wrong with it, but also nothing particularly spectacular. Or, perhaps it has a good characteristic that's evenly counter-weighted by something weak.
6 A solidly good bar with one characteristic that's above par, for example a great texture.
7 An solidly good chocolate that has two above par characteristics, but nothing mind-blowing. Good, above average flavor, but nothing to die for.
8 An excellent bar with no weaknesses and at least one characteristic that's super.
9 An awesome bar to die for with amazing texture and flavor.
10 You have been touched by God.


Back to the list of bars

Thursday, June 7, 2018

Williams-Sonoma Good and Evil 72% by Bourdain and ripert
























About: What to say about this. I was too lazy to research it, because of having a life. But some things don't require research. First, Williams-Sonoma didn't make this chocolate. They don't make the pots they sell, either, in case you're wondering. And I'm pretty sure that celebrity chefs Anthony Bourdain and Eric Rupert didn't make this either. The funny thing is that it's just a regular bar - cocoa, sugar, and lecithin. So the art here is in the chocolate making, and being in front of a camera does shit-all for teaching you about conching. But... 5 points for marketing, I guess.

The chocolate maker here is Eclat chocolate, a Pennsylvania-made chocolate maker started by Christopher Curtin, who claims to have studied in Switzerland, Belgium, France, Germany and Japan. So... all the chocolate meccas. Tastes like he was a good student.

Flavor: Really pretty good. It's a big sweet overall, and it's not bean-to-bar fresh, somehow. It lacks that fresh aromatic zing you get from a really fresh bar. But it's rich, full flavored, long lasting, and fruity. Liked it.

Texture: Oh yeah, smooth. This is a creamy delight, a felty tongue treat, a quiet snow-filled night for your mouth. Plus 2 here.


My rating:  Solid 9. Would eat again.



Rating Value Meaning
1 Really bad chocolate. There's something just really really wrong here in almost every imaginable respect.
2 A bar with this rating has at least two drawbacks.
3 A bar where something is starting to get seriously wrong.... for example, really weak flavor with an otherwise acceptable texture.
4 This bar is below average, but just slightly. Mostly it's not worth eating again. Something isn't quite up to par, for example a poor texture but fine flavor.
5 This is an average good bar that's worth eating. There's nothing really wrong with it, but also nothing particularly spectacular. Or, perhaps it has a good characteristic that's evenly counter-weighted by something weak.
6 A solidly good bar with one characteristic that's above par, for example a great texture.
7 An solidly good chocolate that has two above par characteristics, but nothing mind-blowing. Good, above average flavor, but nothing to die for.
8 An excellent bar with no weaknesses and at least one characteristic that's super.
9 An awesome bar to die for with amazing texture and flavor.
10 You have been touched by God.


Back to the list of bars

Dick Taylor Madagascar 72%


 























About: Dick Taylor is a Northern California manufacturer of bean-to-bar chocolate. 

Flavor:  This is a very good bar, if somewhat sour. I associate that with fermentation based on nothing whatsoever but my own fantastic imagination. Not the sourness. It's sour. The fermentation thing. The sour flavor detracts from the bouquet for me, but .. you know... it's still a great bar.

Texture: Smooth. Not like a Russian in an American bar, but smooth.

My rating:  8. Would have been a 9, but the sourness.



Rating Value Meaning
1 Really bad chocolate. There's something just really really wrong here in almost every imaginable respect.
2 A bar with this rating has at least two drawbacks.
3 A bar where something is starting to get seriously wrong.... for example, really weak flavor with an otherwise acceptable texture.
4 This bar is below average, but just slightly. Mostly it's not worth eating again. Something isn't quite up to par, for example a poor texture but fine flavor.
5 This is an average good bar that's worth eating. There's nothing really wrong with it, but also nothing particularly spectacular. Or, perhaps it has a good characteristic that's evenly counter-weighted by something weak.
6 A solidly good bar with one characteristic that's above par, for example a great texture.
7 An solidly good chocolate that has two above par characteristics, but nothing mind-blowing. Good, above average flavor, but nothing to die for.
8 An excellent bar with no weaknesses and at least one characteristic that's super.
9 An awesome bar to die for with amazing texture and flavor.
10 You have been touched by God.


Back to the list of bars